Great Blogs by Women in Science

What's the day-to-day like for women in science or engineering?

I don't know, ask them. They're out there, doing science, living life, and blogging about it.

For chemistry aficionados, Michelle Francl-Donnay (@MichelleFrancl) at The Culture of Chemistry has a real knack for finding topics in language, teaching, and politics that relate to chemistry in an exciting way. Raychelle Burks (@DrRubidium) of Thirty-Seven is an analytical chemist who does fantastic outreach in support of increasing STEM's inclusiveness towards women, people of color, and LGBTQ folks. Kat Day (@chronicleflask) of the chronicle flask has already called BS on one overhyped health article this year (and blogs a lot of other great chemistry stuff). Beth Haas (@belehaa) at Casual Science and Jenny Martin at cubistcrystal blog their reflections on their careers as chemists and educators, and Anna (@Lady_Beaker) at Chemistry Intersection is documenting her quest for a Ph. D. Jyllian Kemsley (@jkemsley) covers chemical safety in industry and academia for Chemical & Engineering News's The Safety Zone. Stephani Page (@ThePurplePage) runs the blog #BLACKandSTEM. The husband and wife team of Geoffrey and Ruth Bowers (@CarChemProf) is behind Understanding Chemistry through Cars, which has a great perspective combining knowledge of the automotive industry with some of its fundamental chemistry. Last, but not least, Carmen Drahl (@carmendrahl) covers exciting and timely chemistry news at Forbes.

There are great blogs covering topics in other areas of science as well. Thus Spake Zuska (@TSZuska) writes beautifully, relaying stories and perspectives from STEM, politics, personal life, and the areas between. Ulli Hain (@ulli_hain) at Science Extracted covers a range of topics in research with an emphasis on ethics. The women of Portrait of the Scientist document their lives as they pursue a number of different science and science-adjacent paths.

Finally, leveling the playing field for women in STEM is an area for activism and outreach as well as personal reflection. STEM Women (@STEMWomen) is a team of three scientists who aim to bring female scientists together and increase their visibility to the public through blogs, videos, and other great content. Soapbox Science (@SoapboxScience) is a media initiative doing much the same by bringing scientists from around the UK "to the soapbox" to talk about their lives and careers in public presentations. And, unless you just plain hate joy, you've got to follow GeekGirlCon (@GeekGirlCon).

I originally wanted to put this blogroll together to raise awareness of sexual harassment and sexual assault in scientific workplaces. But here's the whole story on that: it happens. A lot. It happens in lecture halls and on research cruises and in meetings and on archaeological digs. It happens to women and scientists of all demographics. Sometimes it's not a secret. It has almost assuredly happened to someone you know. It's unacceptable, it's repugnant, it needs to stop.

So don't sit and think smugly "oh, biology is OK! Chemistry is free of sexual harassment! It's just those astronomers!"

— Matthew R. Francis (@DrMRFrancis) January 12, 2016

The links above are, for the most part, to stories from larger outlets dealing with statistics and responses to well-publicized cases. I wanted to go out and find survivors who have shared their stories, to point out that yes, this happens to real people and it's an intensely personal issue.

I abandoned that search without having found very much. And of course not, I thought. The stakes of publishing a post like that are too high, the emotions too real, and the internet atmosphere too hostile. In the event an investigation actually does get started, it can be a nightmare for the complainant, and it's too easy to misstep.

But how about this stunning revelation? Scientists don't want to write about sexual harassment. These women didn't start science blogs so they could write posts about how hostile their work environments are. They didn't sign up to be scientists so that they could be harassed or worse. We - all of us - became scientists because we're fascinated by some aspect of the material or social world and we want to poke it with a stick. That experience is what scientist-bloggers are publishing about.

Normalizing marginalized voices in our scientific community is critical to achieving equality. Add some of these excellent writers to your feeds. They all speak for themselves.

Special thanks to Beth Haas, Jyllian Kemsley, Chemjobber, Renee Webster, and the rest of Chemistry Twitter for helping me find all of these bloggers. If you know of someone else that I've left off, feel free to add in the comments.

SLACkers: University of Michigan Chemists Experience Premier Research Facility

The #SciBlogReaders survey is still underway! If you enjoy this blog or another science blog, click here to learn how you can help bloggers and win some cool prizes for yourself.
 

From left to right: Nick Miller, Ted Wiley, and Laura Kiefer,
the graduate students who carried out experiments at
SLAC-LCLS last month.

Inside an underground tunnel about thirty miles south of San Francisco, electrons scream by at nearly the speed of light. Suddenly, they find themselves jerked back and forth along their mile-long path by magnets. As they veer around turns, they spit out high-energy X-rays that are the light source for one of the most advanced lasers humans have ever built.

Just another day at the lab.

The Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, or SLAC, is a nationally funded laboratory dedicated to helping scientists answer fundamentally difficult questions about the matter our universe is made of. At SLAC, the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) is home to one of the world's most advanced X-ray lasers - a billion-dollar device about a kilometer long. What is it like to use an instrument that pushes the boundaries of human technology? A group of University of Michigan researchers found that out for themselves this past October.

The proposal that took the group to SLAC was headed up by Roseanne Sension, in collaboration with Jim Penner-Hahn and Kevin Kubarych, all professors at the University of Michigan, and with University of Louisville professor Pawel Kozlowski. Nick Miller and Ted Wiley, graduate students in the Sension group, and Laura Kiefer, a student of Kubarych's, traveled out to California to conduct the experiments with their advisors. Also accompanying the group was Aniruddha Deb, a staff scientist in the Penner-Hahn group.

Nick Miller in one of SLAC-LCLS's long,
long, long hallways. Image credit: Laura Kiefer

While that might seem like a large group for a science experiment, the shared pool of expertise was instrumental for the group's success. "Each member of the team had something to contribute that the other members didn't know that much about, so it strengthened the proposal," said Wiley. These experiments will make up a large part of his and Miller's theses.

The application process is very competitive. The group found out in June that the proposal, titled "Investigating Structural Changes in Short-lived Excited States of Vitamin B12," had been accepted and that they would be making the trip. During the time between that and their October 14 start date, they planned for lodging, and also went through several online training modules not unlike what would be required of new employees at any lab. "It's a government lab, so it's under a lot of scrutiny," said Wiley. "So, you know, you have to be able to use a stepladder correctly."

There were a few more training modules on-site at SLAC-LCLS. Then, the marathon began.

The group performed measurements between 9 PM and 9 AM for four straight days. "You get delirious on the night shift," said Kiefer. But no time could be wasted. Although the expenses for the actual measurements are paid by grants from the United States Department of Energy, the bill is extremely high - to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars per hour. "So we got to this point where we were just goofing off, talking, and it was like, 'It's eleven dollars a second for you to say that!'" Wiley recalled of the late night experiments.

The technique the group used is called X-ray pump-probe spectroscopy. The measurement involves "pumping" the sample with a green laser, putting it into an electronic excited state. Then, a pulse of X-ray light, the "probe," comes in, allowing the experimenter to measure the X-ray absorption spectrum of an electronically excited molecule. "These experiments weren't possible a few years ago," notes Wiley.

This area of the laser performs diagnostics on the incoming X-ray beam
before hitting the sample at the far right. Image credit: Laura Kiefer. [enlarge]

SLAC-LCLS technicians had built the experiment preceding the group's arrival based on the specifications of their proposal. Once they arrived, all the group had to do to begin measurements was prepare a sample at a nearby laboratory. That's probably for the best, though, notes Wiley. "It's one of the only two free electron lasers on Earth. They're not going to just let some turkey that doesn't know what they're doing do anything for them."

Even though the experiment was pre-built, the first day still involved a lot of setup in which the group worked closely with technicians. "During the first day, they have to get both the optical beam and the X-ray beam overlapped in space and time," Miller said. The sample, a jet of solution which shoots downwards through the crossed laser beams, has to be positioned very accurately as well; an error of even 10 micrometers, less than the width of a human hair, is enough to ruin the measurement.

The green-themed control room for X-ray pump probe. Each
measurement at SLAC-LCLS is color-coded. "The red was
just obnoxious," said Miller. Image credit: Laura Kiefer

After the first day of setup, the group became much more independent. From 9 to 9 solid, the entire group, professors included, was buzzing in the control room. Miller credits the group's diverse expertise for their success. "[...] It made us a lot stronger while we were there," he said. Some people worked on conducting the measurements, while others, particularly Kubarych and Deb, built computer programs to analyze the data on-the-fly. Without the ability to quickly analyze data, "we would have been lost," said Miller.

At that point, the technicians let the researchers do their thing. "It's actually amazing how much freedom you have. Once things are going, you can do it," said Kiefer.

"It was an exhausting experience," said Wiley. "First of all, you're jet-lagged by three hours by flying to California. Then you invert your sleep schedule and try to sleep during the day." Never mind the four consecutive twelve-hour work days.

Despite the endurance contest, Miller, Kiefer, and Wiley seem to think that their efforts were a success. The proposal contained a strong plan with all sorts of contingencies laid out in case things went wrong or data didn't come out as anticipated. "I think the thing that we didn't think about was, well, what do we do if it goes really well?" said Wiley. "And it did go well," added Miller. "We ended up doing some unexpected experiments on the third and fourth day, and those actually are going to be maybe some of the most significant results that we found."

As if performing cutting-edge science wasn't enough, the three were exposed to some of the most advanced devices on Earth just by walking through the LCLS facility. "Seeing the technology that they have is un-freaking-believable," said Kiefer. Wiley added, "They had the world's [smoothest] surface for x-ray lasers. The [smoothest] surface on Earth, ever made, being kept in a vacuum that's a thousand times lower pressure than outer space."

X-ray pump-probe is just one of the types of measurements that can be conducted at SLAC-LCLS. Overall, there are six different types of experiments available, and a seventh to be added in 2016. With evocative names like Macromolecular Femtosecond Crystallography and Matter in Extreme Conditions, these experiments sit on the fringe of what is possible in experimental science.

Ted Wiley takes a long draw off of the sample
jet depicted on the video monitor. Image credit:
Laura Kiefer

When asked about his favorite part of the experience, Wiley got poetic. "Messing around with all the gizmos, man," he said.

"My favorite part was being at the helm," Miller said, "being in control of the two million-dollar experiment." Kiefer added, "It's pretty amazing that you can be hands-on at this facility."

The group wasn't ready to talk about the scientific results yet, but you'll probably be hearing about them soon. SLAC reported last year that 341 scientific publications have come out of LCLS in the five years between 2009 and 2014. Of those, 31% were published in high-profile journals - not surprising, considering that the measurements available there can only be performed in a few other places on the planet.

Now that the data has been collected and they've settled back in Ann Arbor, Miller, Wiley, and Kiefer talk about their trip with obvious enthusiasm. (Kiefer's library of photos is testament to that as well.) "It's big science," Wiley said. "In every sense of the word."